Restorative Justice Tribal Laws Database

The National Center on Restorative Justice’s (NCORJ) Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database was created as a resource for restorative justice advocates, practitioners, researchers, and policy-makers—both for tribes and throughout other jurisdictions in the United States. Our aim is to organize and display in an easily navigated format the ways in which tribes have codified the use of restorative justice approaches. This database expands upon NCORJ’s Restorative Justice Laws Database, which lists state restorative justice laws. 

The expansion of the Restorative Justice Laws Database to include tribal laws was a natural one. Contemporary restorative justice has roots in Indigenous cultures and practices, both in the United States and globally, and tribes continue to be leaders in restorative justice practice and systems today. This Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database shows the many codified restorative justice practices that exist in tribal law and is, to our knowledge, the first time this data has been collected and presented in a public and easily accessible format.

Thank you to Grace Carson for her leadership and expertise in the creation of this database. Thank you also to the research assistants who helped on this project: Kylie Belt, Anna VanRoy, and Jonathan Eagle. 

The NCORJ is committed to continuing to update this database. This database was last updated in January 2026. If you see something that is missing or a correction is required, please be in touch. For more information about the development of the database, to get assistance navigating it, or to request a copy of the raw data for research purposes, please contact Lindsey Pointer (lpointer@vermontlaw.edu).

NOTES REGARDING THE TRIBAL CODES AND TRIBES INCLUDED IN THE DATABASE

Tribal Code Accessibility 

Many tribes’ legal codes are not included in this database due to the fact that those tribes do not have their code published and/or do not wish to share their code with the public. The codes in this database should not be considered the only tribal restorative justice laws to exist. 

Tribes Included

The tribes included in the Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database are those who are federally recognized. Federally recognized tribes are those that are formally acknowledge by the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs as holding a government-to-government relationship with the federal government. As such, these tribes have recognized tribal sovereignty. With recognized tribal sovereignty comes the right to tax, make and enforce laws, and regulate activities. Important for this database, federal recognition comes with established tribal criminal jurisdiction (though, this jurisdiction is dependent on where the tribe is located, among other factors). Tribes that are not federally recognized (i.e., are only state recognized) lack the ability to exercise the same rights and powers that tribes whose sovereignty is formally acknowledged by the federal government, and as such, lack tribal criminal jurisdiction (though, tribes that are not federally recognized may be able to establish restorative justice practices and efforts through other means, such as through social services, grant funded projects, and intergovernmental agreements with the state). Because of this, we decided to limit the tribes included in this database to those that are federally recognized. We acknowledge that the recognition process for tribes is a product of settler colonialism, and purposefully exclusionary. We do not view tribes that are not federally recognized as any less valid than those that are.  

Additional Information

  • State

56 results found

Informal Conference with a Peacemaker

Section 305 – Appointment of Peacemaker. (a) The Tribal Court may appoint a Peacemaker in the sound discretion of the Tribal Court, but only with the concurrence of the parties. Upon the filing of a request for peacemaking, the clerk…

Limitations of a Peacemaker

Section 104 – Scope. Subject to the limitations under Section 203, a judge of the Tribal Court may appoint a Peacemaker in a community where the parties to the dispute are members of the Tribe or Indians residing on the…

Effort to Enforcement to Traditional Methods to Resolving Disputes

Section 101 – Purposes. These rules are intended to give formal support, structure and enforcement to traditional Northern Arapaho methods of resolving disputes through mediation and the use of traditional ways without the imposition of judges or lawyers. […] Section…

Service Plan for Child Welfare Cases

708.22-5. Service plans and Conditions. In a proceeding in which a child has been found to be in need of protection or services, the Court may order the child’s parent, guardian and legal custodian to comply with any conditions and/or…

Quileute Elders Panel for Juvenile Offenses

§17.1 QUILEUTE ELDERS PANEL ESTABLISHED The Quileute Tribe recognizes that its children and youth are the Tribe’s greatest treasure and resource. To support Quileute children and youth who have come into contact with the Quileute justice system, the Quileute Tribe…

Opportunity for Family Conference for Vulnerable Adult

7.28.170 Voluntary protective service plans. (a) Protective services will be provided through the Puyallup APS on a voluntary basis when: (1) Services are requested by a vulnerable Tribal adult who the Tribe has determined to be in need of protective…

Attempted Prevention of Domestic Violence

20A.06.020 Nooksack Tribal Health Center Required to Provide Certain Information to Parents. A. The purpose of this Section, as a first step in the process of providing essential safeguards and services for families, is to avert the trauma of domestic…