Restorative Justice Tribal Laws Database

The National Center on Restorative Justice’s (NCORJ) Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database was created as a resource for restorative justice advocates, practitioners, researchers, and policy-makers—both for tribes and throughout other jurisdictions in the United States. Our aim is to organize and display in an easily navigated format the ways in which tribes have codified the use of restorative justice approaches. This database expands upon NCORJ’s Restorative Justice Laws Database, which lists state restorative justice laws. 

The expansion of the Restorative Justice Laws Database to include tribal laws was a natural one. Contemporary restorative justice has roots in Indigenous cultures and practices, both in the United States and globally, and tribes continue to be leaders in restorative justice practice and systems today. This Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database shows the many codified restorative justice practices that exist in tribal law and is, to our knowledge, the first time this data has been collected and presented in a public and easily accessible format.

Thank you to Grace Carson for her leadership and expertise in the creation of this database. Thank you also to the research assistants who helped on this project: Kylie Belt, Anna VanRoy, and Jonathan Eagle. 

The NCORJ is committed to continuing to update this database. This database was last updated in January 2026. If you see something that is missing or a correction is required, please be in touch. For more information about the development of the database, to get assistance navigating it, or to request a copy of the raw data for research purposes, please contact Lindsey Pointer (lpointer@vermontlaw.edu).

NOTES REGARDING THE TRIBAL CODES AND TRIBES INCLUDED IN THE DATABASE

Tribal Code Accessibility 

Many tribes’ legal codes are not included in this database due to the fact that those tribes do not have their code published and/or do not wish to share their code with the public. The codes in this database should not be considered the only tribal restorative justice laws to exist. 

Tribes Included

The tribes included in the Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database are those who are federally recognized. Federally recognized tribes are those that are formally acknowledged by the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs as holding a government-to-government relationship with the federal government. As such, these tribes have recognized tribal sovereignty. With recognized tribal sovereignty comes the right to tax, make and enforce laws, and regulate activities. Important for this database, federal recognition comes with established tribal criminal jurisdiction (though, this jurisdiction is dependent on where the tribe is located, among other factors). Tribes that are not federally recognized (i.e., are only state recognized) lack the ability to exercise the same rights and powers that tribes whose sovereignty is formally acknowledged by the federal government, and as such, lack tribal criminal jurisdiction (though, tribes that are not federally recognized may be able to establish restorative justice practices and efforts through other means, such as through social services, grant funded projects, and intergovernmental agreements with the state). Because of this, we decided to limit the tribes included in this database to those that are federally recognized. We acknowledge that the recognition process for tribes is a product of settler colonialism, and purposefully exclusionary. We do not view tribes that are not federally recognized as any less valid than those that are.  

Additional Information

  • State

72 results found

Juvenile Code Purpose – Rehabilitation Over Punishment

37.01.030 Purpose and Scope. The general purposes of these provisions governing the definition of juvenile offenses are: […] (5) To remove from children committing juvenile offenses, the legal consequences of criminal behavior and to substitute a program of supervision, care…

Domestic Violence Perpetrator Treatment (Court-Ordered)

§7.28.14(a)(5) Order appropriate domestic violence perpetrator’s treatment as warranted. (A) For the purposes of this section, a domestic violence perpetrator’s treatment assessment should include the following: an official copy of current and past criminal history; all violence history whether or…

Juvenile Sentencing Alternatives

5.20.025 – Sentencing of Juvenile Defendants In sentencing a defendant who is under the age of eighteen (18) years, the Court may, but is not required to, impose one or more of the following sanctions in lieu of all or…

Sentencing Guidelines – Traditional Remedies and Rehabilitation

4.65.005 – Sentencing- Guidelines The judges of the Court shall have broad latitude in the sentencing of persons convicted of any offense, except in cases concerning Class A Criminal Offenses, wherein the prescribed sentences shall be considered mandatory. Sentences for…

Treatment Program as Sentencing Option

21.07.01 Sentencing Any person who has been convicted of a criminal offense in the Shoalwater Bay Tribal Court may be sentenced to once or a combination of the following penalties: … (e) Enrollment in a treatment program.

Juvenile Alternative Sentencing

9.12.050 Sentencing of Juvenile Defendants In sentencing a defendant who is under the age of eighteen (18) years, the Court may impose one or more of the following sanctions in lieu of all or part of the fine and/or jail…