Restorative Justice Tribal Laws Database

The National Center on Restorative Justice’s (NCORJ) Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database was created as a resource for restorative justice advocates, practitioners, researchers, and policy-makers—both for tribes and throughout other jurisdictions in the United States. Our aim is to organize and display in an easily navigated format the ways in which tribes have codified the use of restorative justice approaches. This database expands upon NCORJ’s Restorative Justice Laws Database, which lists state restorative justice laws. 

The expansion of the Restorative Justice Laws Database to include tribal laws was a natural one. Contemporary restorative justice has roots in Indigenous cultures and practices, both in the United States and globally, and tribes continue to be leaders in restorative justice practice and systems today. This Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database shows the many codified restorative justice practices that exist in tribal law and is, to our knowledge, the first time this data has been collected and presented in a public and easily accessible format.

Thank you to Grace Carson for her leadership and expertise in the creation of this database. Thank you also to the research assistants who helped on this project: Kylie Belt, Anna VanRoy, and Jonathan Eagle. 

The NCORJ is committed to continuing to update this database. This database was last updated in January 2026. If you see something that is missing or a correction is required, please be in touch. For more information about the development of the database, to get assistance navigating it, or to request a copy of the raw data for research purposes, please contact Lindsey Pointer (lpointer@vermontlaw.edu).

NOTES REGARDING THE TRIBAL CODES AND TRIBES INCLUDED IN THE DATABASE

Tribal Code Accessibility 

Many tribes’ legal codes are not included in this database due to the fact that those tribes do not have their code published and/or do not wish to share their code with the public. The codes in this database should not be considered the only tribal restorative justice laws to exist. 

Tribes Included

The tribes included in the Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database are those who are federally recognized. Federally recognized tribes are those that are formally acknowledged by the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs as holding a government-to-government relationship with the federal government. As such, these tribes have recognized tribal sovereignty. With recognized tribal sovereignty comes the right to tax, make and enforce laws, and regulate activities. Important for this database, federal recognition comes with established tribal criminal jurisdiction (though, this jurisdiction is dependent on where the tribe is located, among other factors). Tribes that are not federally recognized (i.e., are only state recognized) lack the ability to exercise the same rights and powers that tribes whose sovereignty is formally acknowledged by the federal government, and as such, lack tribal criminal jurisdiction (though, tribes that are not federally recognized may be able to establish restorative justice practices and efforts through other means, such as through social services, grant funded projects, and intergovernmental agreements with the state). Because of this, we decided to limit the tribes included in this database to those that are federally recognized. We acknowledge that the recognition process for tribes is a product of settler colonialism, and purposefully exclusionary. We do not view tribes that are not federally recognized as any less valid than those that are.  

Additional Information

  • State

286 results found

Restorative Purpose in Children’s Code

8.01.010 Declaration of Purpose. (a) It is the sovereign right of the Lummi Nation to determine the best interests of its children, and its responsibility to protect, care for and nurture our children. (b) The Lummi Nation declares that the…

Vulnerable Adult Protection Plan and Court-ordered Plan-Disposition

12.1.200 Suggested Vulnerable Adult Protection Plan. The presenting officer shall prepare a written plan describing all reasonable and appropriate alternatives for protecting the vulnerable adult and assisting his or her family. The plan shall explain why it is necessary and…

Child Protective Board Mediation Panel Hearings

Section 8.11 Child Protective Board Mediation Panel Hearings (A) Request for Mediation Hearing: A mediation panel hearing may be requested by the Presenting Officer, the Indian Child Welfare Worker, or by order of the Court. The request shall be filed…

Agreed Disposition as Court Order (Youth Cases)

Section 8.12 Agreed Disposition as Court Order The Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas Youth Court may enter an order based on an agreed disposition reached during a Peacemaker Program Mediation Hearing provided that: (A) A petition for Fact Finding has…

Disposition Options for Juvenile Cases

4-13-1. Findings of Jurisdictional Facts – Disposition of Case. When a child is found to come within the provisions of Section 4-3-1 of this Code, the Court shall so adjudicate, and make findings of the facts upon which it bases…

Informal Conference/Hearing in Child Welfare

5-2-252 Informal Hearing. The Child Welfare officer may hold an informal conference with the minor and the minor’s parent, guardian or custodian to discuss alternatives to the filing of a petition if: (a) The admitted facts bring the case within…

Family Preservation Plan for Child In Need Of Care

Section 33.01.07 Indian Child Welfare Committee Meetings […] E. Family Preservation Plan. The purpose of the Family Preservation Plan is to resolve the problems within the family that may cause or have caused a child to be determined to be…

Dispositional Alternatives for Termination of Parental Rights

SECTION 7.08 DISPOSITIONAL ALTERNATIVES. If parental rights to a child are terminated, the Oglala Sioux Tribal Juvenile Court shall place the minor in a foster care facility, a shelter care facility, or may make pre-adoptive placement provided that whichever facility…