Restorative Justice Tribal Laws Database

The National Center on Restorative Justice’s (NCORJ) Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database was created as a resource for restorative justice advocates, practitioners, researchers, and policy-makers—both for tribes and throughout other jurisdictions in the United States. Our aim is to organize and display in an easily navigated format the ways in which tribes have codified the use of restorative justice approaches. This database expands upon NCORJ’s Restorative Justice Laws Database, which lists state restorative justice laws. 

The expansion of the Restorative Justice Laws Database to include tribal laws was a natural one. Contemporary restorative justice has roots in Indigenous cultures and practices, both in the United States and globally, and tribes continue to be leaders in restorative justice practice and systems today. This Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database shows the many codified restorative justice practices that exist in tribal law and is, to our knowledge, the first time this data has been collected and presented in a public and easily accessible format.

Thank you to Grace Carson for her leadership and expertise in the creation of this database. Thank you also to the research assistants who helped on this project: Kylie Belt, Anna VanRoy, and Jonathan Eagle. 

The NCORJ is committed to continuing to update this database. This database was last updated in January 2026. If you see something that is missing or a correction is required, please be in touch. For more information about the development of the database, to get assistance navigating it, or to request a copy of the raw data for research purposes, please contact Lindsey Pointer (lpointer@vermontlaw.edu).

NOTES REGARDING THE TRIBAL CODES AND TRIBES INCLUDED IN THE DATABASE

Tribal Code Accessibility 

Many tribes’ legal codes are not included in this database due to the fact that those tribes do not have their code published and/or do not wish to share their code with the public. The codes in this database should not be considered the only tribal restorative justice laws to exist. 

Tribes Included

The tribes included in the Tribal Restorative Justice Laws Database are those who are federally recognized. Federally recognized tribes are those that are formally acknowledged by the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs as holding a government-to-government relationship with the federal government. As such, these tribes have recognized tribal sovereignty. With recognized tribal sovereignty comes the right to tax, make and enforce laws, and regulate activities. Important for this database, federal recognition comes with established tribal criminal jurisdiction (though, this jurisdiction is dependent on where the tribe is located, among other factors). Tribes that are not federally recognized (i.e., are only state recognized) lack the ability to exercise the same rights and powers that tribes whose sovereignty is formally acknowledged by the federal government, and as such, lack tribal criminal jurisdiction (though, tribes that are not federally recognized may be able to establish restorative justice practices and efforts through other means, such as through social services, grant funded projects, and intergovernmental agreements with the state). Because of this, we decided to limit the tribes included in this database to those that are federally recognized. We acknowledge that the recognition process for tribes is a product of settler colonialism, and purposefully exclusionary. We do not view tribes that are not federally recognized as any less valid than those that are.  

Additional Information

  • State

940 results found

Fort Peck Wellness Court Programs

Title 6. Chapter 10. Fort Peck Wellness Court Programs Sections: Sec. 1001. Purpose. ……………………………….. 35 Sec. 1002. Definitions. …………………………… 35 Sec. 1003. Jurisdiction. ………………………….. 35 Sec. 1004. Rules of evidence. …………………. 36 Sec. 1005. Wellness Court procedures. …….. 36 Sec.…

Restorative & Rehabilitative Probation

Sec. 706. Declaration of purpose and policy. The Tribal Executive Board finds and declares that probation is a desirable disposition of appro- priate criminal cases because: (a) It provides a framework by which the Tribes can supervise positive rehabilitative measures…

Rehabilitation for Substance Abuse

7-9-3 Possession of Liquor. A. Offense. A person commits an offense pursuant to this section, if he or she intentionally or knowingly possesses, or transports any beer, ale, wine, whiskey or any other beverage which produces alcoholic in toxication, and…

Kings of Rehabilitative Punishment for Benefit of Tribe

Rule 33: Kinds of Punishments A. Kinds of Punishments All persons convicted of any offense may ,be sentenced to imprisonment, fine, work, or a combination ,of these punishments. However, no section.ofthis Code shall prohibit the Judge from imposing any sentence…

Least Restrictive Treatment Program Approach

2.5 Court Proceedings. (1) All petitions provided for herein shall be signed in forn of a Reservation Judge, and shall be considered civil proceedings with no record of jail time served, even if a subject is held in a jail…

Juvenile Cases Regarded as Civil Proceedings

3-1-4. Proceedings as Civil in Nature. A. Proceedings in juvenile cases shall be regarded as civil proceedings with the Court exercising certain equitable powers. Any disposicion under this Code shall not be deemed a conviction of a crime, shall not…

Disposition Permitted at Informal Conference

3-2-8. Disposition Permitted at Informal Conference. A. The following dispositions are permissible at the informal conference hearing. All dispositions must be voluntarily agreed to by all parties to the hearing. 1. Release the child to parent. Guardian or adult custodian…

Dispositional Hearings and Dispositions Permissible

3-2-17. Dispositional Hearing. A dispositional hearing shall’ be conducted as soon as practicable after the conclusion of the adjudicatory’ hearing. Adequate time between the hearings, not to exceed 15 working days, shall be alJowed to permit the Court to consider…

Informal Conference to Discuss Alternatives for Juvenile Cases

3-2-7 Investigation and Informal Conference. Where the Court has made a preliminary finding that further custodial care of the child is necessary, the Co’urt shalI order the designated officials of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe to conduct a preliminary investigation into…